You don't have to use Bundler to create new RubyGems
2012 / 05 / 20 — bundler, ore
Warning: Controversial Content
If you are morally or ethically opposed to using Project Generators and prefer to create RubyGems by hand, STOP READING AND CLICK THE BACK BUTTON.
I am perfectly aware that one does not need any tools to create a RubyGem, and that all you really need is RubyGems and a *.gemspec file. However, the majority of users do not have the time or patience to create each Ruby project from scratch. Thus developers have historically used project generators such as Hoe, Jeweler and now Bundler.
If you are a diehard Bundler user, please read the entire blog post. This blog post is not putting Bundler down, nor is it posing a binary choice between Bundler and some new tool.
Bundler was initially created as a more robust way to manage dependencies of Rails3 applications. Once Bundler was integrated into the Rails3 generator templates, developers realized Bundler could also be used to manage the dependencies of any large Ruby application or library.
In order to help developers create projects with Bundler already setup,
template files and a
bundle gem command were added.
Since Bundler was the "new hotness" and developers were becoming increasingly
dissatisfied with Jeweler/Hoe, the community began to
cargo cult Bundler as the defacto way to create RubyGems.
After having extensively used Bundler with Ronin, to keep it's many
repositories in-sync with each other, I can definitely say Bundler
solved dependency management for large Ruby projects.
However, I began to question using
bundle gem to create new RubyGems.
At first it made sense to provide a
bundle gem command, but project
generation is outside of the original scope of Bundler (dependency management).
Furthermore, adding Bundler to an existing project isn't that difficult;
just add a
.gemspec file and a
Given that Bundler's stated goal is to "manage an application's dependencies", it doesn't seem very pragmatic to use Bundler in libraries with zero or only one runtime dependency.
Bundler's template files are a bit spartan as well. The Rakefile template does not include Rake tasks for RDoc or RSpec. This omission might encourage developers to not write documentation or tests, and rush to release.
Ore is a flexible Ruby project generator. Unlike other Ruby project generators, Ore provides many built in templates and allows custom templates to be installed from Git repositories.
$ gem install ore $ mine my_project Generating /home/postmodern/my_project create lib create lib/my_project create spec create .gitignore create .rspec create spec/my_project_spec.rb create spec/spec_helper.rb create .document create my_project.gemspec create ChangeLog.rdoc create LICENSE.txt create README.rdoc create Rakefile create lib/my_project/version.rb create lib/my_project.rb run git init from "." run git add . from "." run git commit -m "Initial commit." from "." $ cd my_project/ $ rake -T rake build # Builds all packages rake clobber_rdoc # Remove RDoc HTML files rake console # Spawns an Interactive Ruby Console rake install # Installs all built gem packages rake rdoc # Build RDoc HTML files rake release # Performs a release rake rerdoc # Rebuild RDoc HTML files rake spec # Run RSpec code examples
Ore also provides many different templates and options:
$ mine --help Usage: mine PATH Options: [--gemspec-yml] [--jeweler-tasks] [--bundler] [--rubygems-tasks] # Default: true [--yard] [--bundler-tasks] [--hg] [--rspec] # Default: true [--rvmrc] [--gem-test] [--gem-package-task] [--gemspec] # Default: true [--test-unit] [--git] # Default: true [--bin] [--rdoc] # Default: true [--markdown] [--textile] -T, [--templates=TEMPLATE [...]] -n, [--name=NAME] -V, [--version=VERSION] # Default: 0.1.0 -s, [--summary=SUMMARY] # Default: TODO: Summary -D, [--description=DESCRIPTION] # Default: TODO: Description -a, [--authors=NAME [...]] # Default: ["postmodern"] -e, [--email=EMAIL] -U, [--homepage=HOMEPAGE] -B, [--bug-tracker=BUG_TRACKER] -L, [--license=LICENSE] # Default: MIT
As you can see, Ore is completely configurable and supports:
- Git / Mercurial / SubVersion
- .rvmrc files
- rubygems-tasks / Bundler tasks / Jeweler::Tasks / Gem::PackageTask
- RSpec / Test::Unit
- YARD / RDoc documentation
- RDoc / Markdown / Textile markup
Unlike other project generators, Ore focuses only on project generation and does not force a specific project layout or workflow upon the developer. You can even generate projects with Bundler, YARD + Markdown and Mercurial instead of Git:
$ mine my_project --bundler --yard --markdown --hg Generating /home/postmodern/my_project create lib create lib/my_project create spec create .hgignore create .document create .yardopts create Gemfile create .rspec create spec/my_project_spec.rb create spec/spec_helper.rb create my_project.gemspec create ChangeLog.md create LICENSE.txt create README.md create Rakefile create lib/my_project/version.rb create lib/my_project.rb run hg init from "." run hg add . from "." run hg commit -m "Initial commit." from "." $ cd my_project && bundle install $ rake spec /home/postmodern/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p194/bin/ruby -S rspec ./spec/my_project_spec.rb MyProject should have a VERSION constant Finished in 0.00593 seconds 1 example, 0 failures
Think Outside of the Bundle
Now that you have been introduced to Ore, I hope you will at the very least give it a try. I also hope you will understand that I am not simply anti-Bundler / pro-Ore. Ore gives you the option of generating Ruby projects with/without Bundler. The two tools are not mutually exclusive.